Rederij Clipper Stad Amsterdam · CDC inspection record

Stad Amsterdam CDC inspection score

Latest score, full inspection history and the violations CDC inspectors found on Stad Amsterdam.

  • Source: CDC public records
  • Data checked on October 31, 2026
  • Pass mark: 86 out of 100
  • Independent site, not the CDC
Rederij Clipper Stad AmsterdamInspected June 5, 2025

Latest CDC sanitation score

Passed

Stad Amsterdam scored 86 out of 100 in its latest CDC Vessel Sanitation Program inspection, on June 5, 2025. It passed: ships pass with 86 or more.

−5 vs previous inspection (91, Apr 16, 2019)
89.4average of the last 5 inspections
56lowest score (March 2007)
11inspections since 2006
2failed inspections

No CDC inspection in over a year. Stad Amsterdam is on the CDC Green Sheet, but its latest published inspection is from June 5, 2025. The CDC says that a ship sailing outside the United States for an extended period “may not be inspected twice a year” and is inspected again when it returns (CDC FAQ).

Inspection history of Stad Amsterdam

Every CDC inspection score on record for Stad Amsterdam: 11 inspections from April 8, 2006 to June 5, 2025, no perfect scores of 100 and 2 failed inspections.

5060708090100Fail zone: 85 or lower2006200920122015201820212024Apr 8, 2006: 62Mar 29, 2007: 56Mar 25, 2009: 91Apr 22, 2011: 93Apr 17, 2012: 90Mar 18, 2014: 89Apr 14, 2015: 93Apr 24, 2017: 88Feb 27, 2018: 89Apr 16, 2019: 91Jun 5, 2025: 865060708090100Fail zone: 85 or lower20062010201420182022Apr 8, 2006: 62Mar 29, 2007: 56Mar 25, 2009: 91Apr 22, 2011: 93Apr 17, 2012: 90Mar 18, 2014: 89Apr 14, 2015: 93Apr 24, 2017: 88Feb 27, 2018: 89Apr 16, 2019: 91Jun 5, 2025: 86

All scores

Inspection dateResultReportScore
June 5, 2025Passedfindings below86
April 16, 2019Passedfindings below91
February 27, 2018Passedfindings below89
April 24, 2017Passed88
April 14, 2015Passed93
March 18, 2014Passed89
April 17, 2012Passed90
April 22, 2011Passed93
March 25, 2009Passed91
March 29, 2007Failed56
April 8, 2006Failed62

What the inspectors found

The full findings of the last 3 inspections, as written in the CDC reports. Each finding refers to an item of the CDC’s Vessel Sanitation Program standards; points are deducted by item, for a single significant violation or for a pattern of similar ones (CDC FAQ).

June 5, 2025

86Passed

35 findings · 14 points deducted

Points deducted (100 − 14 = 86):

  • −5 ptsItem 03: PW bunker / production source; Halogen residual
  • −3 ptsItem 07: PW system protection cross-connections, backflow; Disinfection
  • −3 ptsItem 13: Management, knowledge, monitoring
  • −2 ptsItem 06: Halogen analyzer chart recorder maintained, operated, records; Sampling, records
  • −1 ptItem 08: PW filling hoses, caps, connections, procedures; Sample records, valves; PW system constructed, maintained

All 35 findings the inspectors wrote down, grouped by area of the ship. Findings with a red edge belong to an item that lost points; the others were noted without a deduction.

Drinking water13 findings

  • Item 03Bunkering and Production Records

    On multiple days, the chlorine residual level did not reach 2 ppm and above during bunkering and production. The ship bunked water below 2 ppm on the following days: - May 25 for 4 hours - May 27 for 3.5 hours - June 3 1.5 hours The ship produced water below 2ppm on the following days: - May 29 for 8.5 hours - May 30 for 5 hours - June 1 for 8 hours

  • Item 04Chlorine Residual Levels

    The data logger record for May 26 showed very low chlorine levels (between 0.04- 0.1 ppm chlorine) in the distribution system for the entire day.

  • Item 06Microbiological Tests

    There were no shoreside microbiologic reports from the port and no onboard E. coli tests for bunkering that occurred in May or June.

  • Item 06Water Test Kit

    The ship had no method to check the calibration of the water test kit onboard. There was also no documentation of when the water test kit was last calibrated.

  • Item 07Potable Water Tank Disinfection

    The two potable water tanks were not disinfected after being opened for inspection in November 2024.

  • Item 07Variance: Potable Water Tank Shares Wall with Hull of Vessel

    The ship was not following their variance for potable water tanks that share a wall with the vessel hull. The ship's approved variance states the salinity of the potable water tanks will be monitored using a salinometer equipped with an alarm. The alarm sounds both audibly and visually in the engine control room. The salinomterer's sensor had been out of order since February, and the ship was awaiting spare parts to fix it. Staff were taking daily salinity readings and recording this in the daily log. The ship's variance also stated the bunkered and produced water used to fill the tanks must be chlorinated to minimum of 2.0ppm. A minimum of 2.0 ppm chlorine was not reached during the past 6 times of bunkering and production.

  • Item 08Potable Water Room

    The bunkering line was not striped blue or blue/green/blue right after coming through the deckhead. This was corrected. The line after the chemical injection point leading to the potable water tanks was striped blue/gray/blue, indicating this water was technical. This was corrected.

  • Item 08Cross Connection Control Log

    The cross connection control log did not list the protection used (for example: air gap, manufacturer name, designation for the device).

  • Item 08Laundry Backflow Prevention Device

    There were no vents on the backflow prevention device on the water supply lines to the laundry.

  • Item 08Bunkering and Production Records

    The chlorine residual was not adjusted to a minimum of 2.0 ppm within 30 minutes of the start of bunkering and production on multiple dates.

  • Item 08Bunkering Station

    There was no cap on the small bunkering filling line.

  • Item 08Bunkering Station

    It was unknown whether the small bunkering hoses material was approved for potable water use.

  • Item 08Bunkering Station

    The small potable water filling hose was not labeled as 'potable water only.'

Food safety, general1 finding

  • Item 13Food Service General

    There were multiple instances where potentially hazardous foods (PHF) were logged only with an initial cooling temperature and no final cooling temperature. For example: - A pan of roasted skewers was prepared on 6 June and had a start of cooling temperature of 56°C. There was no temperature recorded in the <2 hr or <4 hour column on the cooling log, and the skewers were still onboard in the undercounter refrigerator. - On 3 June, a cheese platter measured 15.5°C at 0901; there were no other temperatures recorded and, according to the cooling log, the food was not served immediately. - On May 30, Beef Bourguignon started cooling at 1230 with an initial temperature of 46°C. There was no final cooling temperature. The Beef Bourguignon was reheated and served on 1 June. - On May 29, rice started cooling at 1107 with an initial temperature of 32°C. There was no final cooling temperature, but the rice was reheated and served later that same day. - On May 28, cooked potatoes had a preparation temperature of 91°C, an initial cooling temperature of 40°C, and there was no final cooling temperature noted. - On May 28, cooked cauliflower had a preparation temperature of 98°C, an initial cooling temperature of 32°C, and no final cooling temperature noted. There were multiple findings related to warewashing: - When testing the undercounter glasswashing machine final rinse temperature, the inspector's thermometer did not reach 160°F at plate surface (71°C). The inspector's thermometer measured the plate surface temperature at 151°F, and 156°F twice. The final rinse gauge read a maximum temperature of 67°C. - All three dishwashing machines were missing a data plate. - The outdoor bar's glasswashing machine had been out of order for more than 1 month. Several crew members were observed using paper towels to hand dry food equipment.

Bars9 findings

  • Item 19Indoor Bar

    An unlabeled container of sugar was stored in the undercounter cabinet. The sugar was labeled prior to the end of the inspection.

  • Item 21Indoor Bar

    The blocks used to raise the coffee machine were wooden and had rough edges. This made the blocks difficult to clean.

  • Item 21Outdoor Bar

    There was a large void space between the top of the undercounter refrigerators and the bottom of the counter top. This made the area difficult to clean.

  • Item 22Indoor Bar

    There was no data plate on the glasswashing machine.

  • Item 22Outdoor Bar

    There was no data plate on the glasswashing machine.

  • Item 22Outdoor Bar

    The glasswashing machine had been out of order for more than 1 month. Staff stated they were waiting for spare parts to arrive. Glasses from the area was sent to the indoor bar or galley for cleaning.

  • Item 27Indoor Bar

    The countertop under the coffee machine and the mug storage rack was soiled with greater than one day's worth of dust and debris.

  • Item 27Outdoor Bar

    Dust collected on top of the undercounter refrigerators in the void space between the undercounter refrigerators and the bottom of the countertop.

  • Item 28Outdoor Bar

    Two small server trays were stored in the dusty void space between the top undercounter refrigerators and the bottom of the countertop.

Buffets7 findings

  • Item 19Buffet

    Staff said food in the crew mess is served buffet style. However, there were no sneeze guards present. No food was out for service during the inspection.

  • Item 21Hot Line

    A large opening was at the deck between the technical space and the right bulkhead. This made the area difficult to clean.

  • Item 27Undercounter Refrigerator

    Water pooled in the bottom of the undercounter refrigerator. The source was unknown.

  • Item 28Cold Line

    Several boxes of new equipment were stored directly on the deck in the storage area. The boxes were moved prior to the end of the inspection.

  • Item 31Cold Line

    Several containers of coffee machine cleaner were stored on the deck next to boxes of new food-service equipment.

  • Item 33Cold Line

    The deck in the storage area was not durable and nonabsorbent.

  • Item 33Hot Line

    There was no coving on the worker side of the buffet.

Galleys (kitchens)4 findings

  • Item 17Cooling Logs

    There were multiple instances where potentially hazardous foods (PHF) were logged only with an initial cooling temperature and no final cooling temperature. For example: - A pan of roasted skewers was prepared on 6 June and had a start of cooling temperature of 56°C. There was no temperature recorded in the <2 hr or <4 hour column on the cooling log, and the skewers were still onboard in the undercounter refrigerator. - On 3 June, a cheese platter measured 15.5°C at 0901; there were no other temperatures recorded and, according to the cooling log, the food was not served immediately. - On May 30, Beef Bourguignon started cooling at 1230 with an initial temperature of 46°C. There was no final cooling temperature. The Beef Bourguignon was reheated and served on 1 June. - On May 29, rice started cooling at 1107 with an initial temperature of 32°C. There was no final cooling temperature, but the rice was reheated and served later that same day. - On May 28, cooked potatoes had a preparation temperature of 91°C, an initial cooling temperature of 40°C, and there was no final cooling temperature noted. - On May 28, cooked cauliflower had a preparation temperature of 98°C, an initial cooling temperature of 32°C, and no final cooling temperature noted.

  • Item 18Walk-in Cooler

    Prosciutto was stored beneath raw bacon. The foods were rearranged.

  • Item 22Hood-Type Dishwashing Machine

    There was no data plate on the dishwashing machine.

  • Item 28Dishwashing Area

    Several crew members were observed using paper towels to hand dry food equipment.

Pantries1 finding

  • Item 24Indoor Bar

    When testing the undercounter glasswashing machine final rinse temperature, the inspector's thermometer did not reach 160°F at plate surface (71°C). The inspector's thermometer measured the plate surface temperature at 151°F, and 156°F twice. The final rinse gauge read a maximum temperature of 67°C. The area was not in operation at the time of the inspection.

April 16, 2019

91Passed

22 findings · 9 points deducted

Points deducted (100 − 9 = 91):

  • −3 ptsItem 13: Management, knowledge, monitoring
  • −2 ptsItem 20: PHF temperature maintenance facilities; Food-contact surfaces designed, constructed, installed, maintained; TMDs provided, located, calibrated
  • −2 ptsItem 22: Dishwashing / equipment washing facilities designed, constructed, maintained, installed, located, operated, TMDs, test kits
  • −1 ptItem 08: PW filling hoses, caps, connections, procedures; Sample records, valves; PW system constructed, maintained
  • −1 ptItem 40: IPM procedures developed; followed; outer openings protected
Show all 22 findings

All 22 findings the inspectors wrote down, grouped by area of the ship. Findings with a red edge belong to an item that lost points; the others were noted without a deduction.

Galleys (kitchens)10 findings

  • Item 08Handwashing Station

    The backflow prevention device for the top combination oven was not accessible to the inspector; making the device difficult to inspect and maintain. This device was hidden by a column and located at the back of the combination oven. Additionally, the backflow prevention device for the bottom combination oven was not visible and could not be identified to the inspector. The inspector was unable to verify if these devices were in working order. This was noted on the previous inspection of February 2018.

  • Item 12Galley

    After washing hands, a cook was observed taking a pan of spaghetti on the front counter, part of the spaghetti spilled out the pan to the counter, and the spilled spaghetti was placed back in the pan with bare hands. After all spaghetti was in the pan again, tongs were used to serve the spaghetti in two big bowls.

  • Item 13Galley

    After washing hands, a cook was observed taking a pan of spaghetti on the front counter, part of the spaghetti spilled out the pan to the counter, and the spilled spaghetti was placed back in the pan with bare hands. After all spaghetti was in the pan again, tongs were used to serve the spaghetti in two big bowls.

  • Item 13Handwashing Station

    A bottle of antimicrobial gel was at the handwashing station. It was removed immediately after the finding.

  • Item 13Cooling Logs

    A number of PHF items were logged only with initial temperatures and no further notations. Staff stated that the food was served instead of being cooled down up to 5°C. There were at least 75 entries like this on the log.

  • Item 16Galley

    Inside the undercounter refrigerator, a container of tomato paste and another container of pesto sauce had opening dates and no discard dates.

  • Item 17Cooling Logs

    A number of PHF items were logged only with initial temperatures and no further notations. Staff stated that the food was served instead of being cooled down up to 5°C. There were at least 75 entries like this on the log.

  • Item 20Galley

    The cutting boards were scratched and scored, making them difficult to clean. This was also noted on the previous inspection of February 2018.

  • Item 22Dishwash

    The data plate of the hood-type warewasher did not indicate wash and final sanitizing rinse times as specified by the manufacturer. It stated a combined cycle time.

  • Item 31Handwashing Station

    A bottle of antimicrobial gel was at the handwashing station. It was removed immediately after the finding.

Pest control3 findings

  • Item 40IPM Plan

    The IPM plan did not have a provision for training. There was no trained personnel.

  • Item 40Follow-up Inspections

    Follow-up inspection results were not documented. Staff stated that follow-up inspections were done after treatments.

  • Item 40Incoming Provision Inspections

    Forms accepting provisions were kept by staff but these forms were not related to IPM activities. The IPM plan had specific instructions these inspections and a form to complete, but this form was not used.

Bars3 findings

  • Item 22Indoor Bar

    The glasswasher had no temperature gauges to monitor the temperature during cycles. When the machine was evaluated, wash temperatures were 76-90°F and final rinse temperatures 107-116°F. The machine was not in active use but hot and in good working order per staff. After the evaluation, staff increased the temperature of the water. Staff stated that this machine was going to be replaced.

  • Item 22Outdoor Bar

    The glasswasher had no temperature gauges to monitor the temperature during cycles. When the machine was evaluated, wash temperatures were 113-115°F and final rinse temperatures 124-125°F. The machine was not in active use but hot and in good working order per staff. After the evaluation, staff increased the temperature of the water. Staff stated that this machine was going to be replaced.

  • Item 36Indoor Bar

    The light intensity behind and around the espresso machine was not 110 lux.

Drinking water2 findings

  • Item 08International Shore Connection

    The international shore connection backflow prevention device was inspected on 6 January 2019 and noted on the backflow log; however, pressure differentials were not recorded in the log. This was noted on the last inspection of February 2018 when it documented the same deficiency for the testing done on 6 January 2018.

  • Item 08Tank Maintenance

    Records documented that potable water tanks 3 & 4 were serviced in November 2018 and shock halogenated to 50 ppm chlorine but no contact time was documented. The halogen residual before the tanks were put back into service was not documented.

Buffets1 finding

  • Item 16Consumer Advisory

    The consumer advisory for cold smoked salmon did not state that it is served raw. Corrections started immediately. A similar violation was noted on the previous inspection of February 2018.

Food safety, general1 finding

  • Item 33Coving

    There was no coving at the food worker side of both buffet lines, the indoor bar, and the indoor bar pantry.

Medical center1 finding

  • Item 0272-hour Questionnaire

    The 72-hour Questionnaire did not comply with the 2018 Operations Manual. The questionnaire did not have a designation if the case was a passenger or crew member.

Pantries1 finding

  • Item 21Indoor Bar

    Close the void of the bottom panel of the technical space under the utility sink.

February 27, 2018

89Passed

34 findings · 11 points deducted

Points deducted (100 − 11 = 89):

  • −5 ptsItem 03: PW bunker / production source; Halogen residual
  • −3 ptsItem 26: Food-contact surfaces equipment / utensils clean; Safe
  • −2 ptsItem 17: Temperature practices storage, preparation display, service, transportation; Thawing
  • −1 ptItem 33: Decks / bulkheads / deckheads construction, repair, clean
Show all 34 findings

All 34 findings the inspectors wrote down, grouped by area of the ship. Findings with a red edge belong to an item that lost points; the others were noted without a deduction.

Galleys (kitchens)26 findings

  • Item 08Galley

    The backflow prevention device for the top combination oven was not accessible to the inspector; making the device difficult to inspect. This device was hidden by a column and located at the back of the combination oven. Additionally, the backflow prevention device for the bottom combination oven was not visible and could not be identified to the inspector. The inspector was unable to verify if these devices were in working order.

  • Item 16Galley

    A tray containing twenty shell eggs was sitting out of the refrigerator during the inspection. Staff stated these eggs had been out over two hours. The inspector took temperatures of three randomly selected eggs and recorded the temperatures at 73°F, 69°F, and 74°F with a tip sensitive thermometer. Staff stated ten of these eggs had been used for the breakfast service earlier in the day. These eggs were discarded.

  • Item 17Walk-In Refrigeration Unit

    A tray of cooked salmon stored in the walk-in refrigerator on temperature control was identified with a date marking sticker of '21/02' and the initials of the preparer. When the inspector reviewed the cooling log for 21 February 2018, the only salmon identified was cooked to a temperature of 70°C at 12:30 and identified as 'finished.' Staff stated the salmon that was stored cold in the walk-in refrigeration unit came directly from the supplier and was mistakenly not entered into the cooling log.

  • Item 17Galley

    A tray of chorizo with black beans stored in the undercounter refrigeration unit on temperature control was identified with a date marking sticker of '25/2' and the initials of the preparer. When the inspector reviewed the cooling log for 25 February 2018, there were no entries for any food prepared on this date. Staff stated this item was mistakenly left off the cooling log. The inspector measured the temperature of this tray of chorizo with black beans at 41°F.

  • Item 17Galley

    A tray of white beans in an undercounter refrigeration unit on temperature control was identified with a date marking sticker of '25 02' and the initials of the preparer. Staff stated all foods on temperature control are identified with the date of preparation. When the inspector reviewed the cooling log for this date, there were no entries for any food prepared on 25 February 2018. Staff stated this was an error in the log, since the log identified these white beans were prepared on 24 February 2018 at 10:00. Staff stated the date marking sticker on the tray was correct. The temperature of this tray of white beans was measured by the inspector at 41°F.

  • Item 20Galley

    A total of eleven cutting boards were excessively scored with knife cut markings. Staff stated these cutting boards were approximately one to two months old. One white cutting board stored in the forward part of the galley was soiled with brown residue and was heavily scored. One red cutting board stored in the aft part of the galley had pieces of plastic visibly rising from the board. Staff stated they would look into purchasing new, more durable cutting boards.

  • Item 20Galley

    Seven glass bowls stored in a cabinet for service were heavily scored. One of the bowls had a chip along the lip. Additionally, one glass bowl was stored with visible food debris attached to the middle of the food contact surface. Staff stated these bowls would be discarded.

  • Item 26Galley

    Seven glass bowls stored in a cabinet for service were heavily scored. One of the bowls had a chip along the lip. Additionally, one glass bowl was stored with visible food debris attached to the middle of the food contact surface. Staff stated these bowls would be discarded.

  • Item 26Galley

    The scoop for the flour bin was soiled with black and white debris along the food contact surface. Staff stated this scoop recently went through the dishwashing process. Staff send this scoop back for rewashing.

  • Item 26Galley

    The underside food splash zone of the mixer was soiled with an accumulation of brown food debris. There was also a heavy accumulation of debris near the surface where the mixing arm attached to the machine. Staff stated this mixer was cleaned earlier this week.

  • Item 26Galley

    Two small, two medium, and one large melamine bowl stored in a cabinet for service were soiled with gray residue along the food contact surfaces. Staff removed these bowls for rewashing.

  • Item 26Galley

    One pan stored in a drawer was soiled with a layer of grease. The inspector rubbed an alcohol wipe over the food contact surface of this pan, and the wipe became soiled with a brown, greasy residue. This pan was removed for rewash.

  • Item 26Galley

    One pot stored in a cabinet was covered with spots of white debris on the inside food contact surface. This pot was removed for rewash.

  • Item 26Galley

    A total of eleven cutting boards were excessively scored with knife cut markings. Staff stated these cutting boards were approximately one to two months old. One white cutting board stored in the forward part of the galley was soiled with brown residue and was heavily scored. One red cutting board stored in the aft part of the galley had pieces of plastic visibly rising from the board. Staff stated they would look into purchasing new, more durable cutting boards.

  • Item 26Galley

    One baking tray stored stacked in a cabinet was soiled with water on the food contact surface of the tray. This tray was stacked above a tray, which had significant water accumulation on the non-food contact surface of the tray. These trays were removed for rewash.

  • Item 27Galley

    One baking tray was stored with an accumulation of moisture on the non-food contact surface inside a cabinet. Additionally, this tray had a buildup of white food residue on the top right side of the non-food contact surface. Moisture from the non-food contact surface of this tray collected on the food contact surface of the tray stored directly above it. These trays were removed for rewash.

  • Item 27Galley

    The inspector removed the cutting board stand located in the aft part of the galley. The counter surface below this stand was soiled with moisture and orange colored debris greater than one day's worth of accumulation.

  • Item 27Galley

    The cabinet surface where the dirty pots and dirty pan were stored appeared soiled with greater than one day's accumulation of debris. The inspector rubbed an alcohol wipe over this surface, and the wipe became soiled with black residue.

  • Item 27Galley

    The inside counter surface of a cabinet used to store 34 trays for food service was excessively soiled with greater than one day's accumulation of debris. The inspector rubbed an alcohol wipe over this surface and the alcohol wipe became soiled with brown and black residue. The 34 trays were stored inverted on top of this surface.

  • Item 28Galley

    One baking tray stored stacked in a cabinet was soiled with water on the food contact surface of the tray. This tray was stacked above a tray, which had significant water accumulation on the non-food contact surface of the tray. These trays were removed for rewash.

  • Item 28Galley

    Two pots were stored wet in a cabinet. When these pots were removed from the cabinet, moisture dripped from the pots onto the deck below. Staff removed these pots for rewash.

  • Item 28Galley

    One baking tray was stored with an accumulation of moisture on the non-food contact surface inside a cabinet. Additionally, this tray had a buildup of white food residue on the top right side of the non-food contact surface. Moisture from the non-food contact surface of this tray collected on the food contact surface of the tray stored directly above it. These trays were removed for rewash.

  • Item 33Potwash Station

    The sanitation sink next to the potwash station was releasing an excessive amount of steam. This steam rose to the deckhead above and collected on the deckhead as condensation. Condensation was not observed dripping from the deckhead. There was no ventilation duct above this sink to the collect the steam and prevent it from collecting as condensation.

  • Item 33Potwash Station

    The inside of the ventilation duct above the potwash station was heavily soiled with greater than a day's worth of accumulation of brown and orange colored debris. This potwash station was in service.

  • Item 33Potwash Station

    A large puddle of water, approximately two centimeters (five inches) thick, was observed underneath the potwash machine. No dripping was observed from the bottom of the machine. This puddle of water was unable to drain into the adjacent drain. Staff stated the boat was listing at the time. This area was in service for dishwashing.

  • Item 37Potwash Station

    The sanitation sink next to the potwash station was releasing an excessive amount of steam. This steam rose to the deckhead above and collected on the deckhead as condensation. Condensation was not observed dripping from the deckhead. There was no ventilation duct above this sink to the collect the steam and prevent it from collecting as condensation. There were two trays of clean cutlery stored underneath this condensation. No condensation was observed dripping onto this cutlery. Staff relocated these two trays of cutlery.

Food storage (provisions)2 findings

  • Item 33Dry Storage Rooms # 31 and # 32

    The decks of the dry storage room # 30 and dry storage room # 32 were not finished and constructed for easy cleaning. Both rooms had three holes in the side of the deck opening inside to the void space. The inside of these holes had an accumulation of brown and red debris. Additionally, the aft ends of these dry storage rooms were not appropriately finished and had an approximate one-inch (2.4 cm) gap, exposing the food storage area to the void space behind it.

  • Item 33Dry Storage Rooms # 31

    The right side of the room underneath the liquor cabinet had an accumulation of debris greater than one day's worth, including one broken noodle piece and pieces of food fragments. Approximately 30 bottles of liquor were stored in the cabinet above this debris.

Drinking water3 findings

  • Item 03Bunkering/Production Halogen and pH Control

    Staff stated the ship is having a difficult time with the pH residual levels while bunkering and producing potable water. Staff stated the parent company sends in a private contractor to set the mechanical levels within the dosing machine. Staff stated that during bunkering and production of potable water, the pH level rises automatically; therefore, staff needs to adjust the halogen levels manually to counteract the pH feed. The staff engineer sent a work order # CSAM-1802-V00741 to the company on 26 February 2018 for assistance. The pH ranges during December 2017 and January 2018 ranged from 8.1 to 9.0. On 26 February 2018, the day prior to the inspection, the pH ranged from 7.8 to 8.5.

  • Item 08Shore Side Connection

    The shore side connection backflow device was inspected on 6 January 2018 and noted in the backflow log; however, the pressure differential testing was not noted in the log.

  • Item 08Potable Water Hoses

    The potable water bunkering hoses were not identified 'Potable Water Only' in letters at least 13 millimeters high at each connecting end. Additionally, the caps that accompany the hoses had rusted chains that did not secure the caps to the hoses. Staff discussed changing out the chains immediately.

Bars2 findings

  • Item 21Inside Bar

    The undercounter refrigerator holding the beer kegs had a heavy condensation/ice buildup inside around the air intake panel. The refrigerator was working and holding the proper temperatures (below 41°F) during the inspection.

  • Item 26Outside Bar

    The beer tap delivery spout on the outside bar was soiled with a brown substance. The bar had been previously cleaned and was not in service during the time of the inspection.

Buffets1 finding

  • Item 16Buffet

    The consumer advisory for the partially cooked smoked salmon only included the product name and the warning 'this product is served undercooked or raw.' This advisory failed to include the statement indicating that consuming raw or undercooked meats, seafood, shellfish, eggs, milk, or poultry may increase your risk for food borne illness.

To see this report on the CDC site: open the CDC inspection search, choose Stad Amsterdam in the list of cruise ships, select “All Dates” and press Search, then open “Report” next to the inspection date. (The CDC tool does not allow direct links to a single report.)

Other Rederij Clipper Stad Amsterdam ships

No other ships of this cruise line are in the CDC list.

All Rederij Clipper Stad Amsterdam CDC scores · All ships · How CDC inspections work